![]() | ![]() |
| |
Three experts on the subject of Yellowstone's geysers provide evidence as to the provenance of the geyser cone displayed in Washington, D.C. (at right). But the evidence is contradictory. Lee Whittlesey, Park Historian, supplies the following: Geologist Walter Weed, in his 1883 field notebooks, states that Superintendent Philetus W. Norris, who served the park from 1877 to 1882, told him that he had taken the cone from Vixen Geyser in Norris Geyser Basin. Whittlesey also says that Norris himself, writing in his 1881 report, mentions that the specimen came from "a secluded defile." Norris Geyser Basin might indeed have been considered secluded in those early days of the park. | ![]() —Photo courtesy of Prof. Duncan Foley, |
|
Rocco Paperiello, who has written detailed reports of geyser activity at Norris Geyser Basin and elsewhere, does not believe the cone came from Vixen. He believes it likely that it came from Avalanche Geyser, whose official name is Oblique Geyser, in the Geyser Creek Group about 3 miles southwest of Norris GB. His reasons for this are:
Here's how T. Scott Bryan writes about Oblique Geyser in the 1995 edition of his book, The Geysers of Yellowstone: "Oblique spouts from not less than seventeen separate vents, and the play from each has its own character. All of the vents open among a pile of boulders that have been coated by a spiny, pale brown geyserite." Note that Bryan mentions 17 vents—as does the Smithsonian's label—and says that the form that this geyser's deposit takes is spiny. Moreover, Vixen Geyser is not located in a defile or gorge, but Oblique/Avalanche definitely is (as shown in a picture in Bryan's book, page 308). Although Rocket Geyser is pictured in the Smithsonian's case with the purloined geyserite cone, no one is suggesting that the cone came from that geyser. The minerals department at the museum has no record of where Norris might have got it.
| |
The mystery remains unsolved.
| |
![]() |
| Home | Top | Search/Site Map |